edu.ucar.opensky::articles:42482 UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact 2025-12-24T18:02:48.086805 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7959nv4 Multi-season evaluation of hurricane analysis and forecast system (HAFS) quantitative precipitation forecasts 2024-11-01T00:00:00Z publication https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7959nv4 https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1417705 Newman, Kathryn M. author Nelson, Brianne author Biswas, Mrinal author Pan, L. author UCAR/NCAR - Library publisher Quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) from numerical weather prediction models need systematic verification to enable rigorous assessment and informed use, as well as model improvements. The United States (US) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently made a major update to its regional tropical cyclone modeling capabilities, introducing two new operational configurations of the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS). NOAA performed multi-season retrospective forecasts using the HAFS configurations during the period that the Hurricane Weather and Forecasting (HWRF) model was operational, which was used to assess HAFS performance for key tropical cyclone forecast metrics. However, systematic QPF verification was not an integral part of the initial evaluation. The first systematic QPF evaluation of the operational HAFS version 1 configurations is presented here for the 2021 and 2022 season re-forecasts as well as the first HAFS operational season, 2023. A suite of techniques, tools, and metrics within the enhanced Model Evaluation Tools (METplus) software suite are used. This includes shifting forecasts to mitigate track errors, regridding model and observed fields to a storm relative coordinate system, as well as object oriented verification. The HAFS configurations have better performance than HWRF for equitable threat score (ETS), but larger over forecast biases than HWRF. Storm relative and object oriented verification show the HAFS configurations have larger precipitation areas and less intense precipitation near the TC center as compared to observations and HWRF. HAFS QPF performance decreased for the 2023 season, but the general spatial patterns of the model QPF were very similar to 2021-2022. UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact PDF Text theme Resource Type 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z publication <span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;font-style:normal;" data-sheets-root="1">Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</span> None eng geoscientificInformation