Informative risk analyses of radiative forcing geoengineering require proper counterfactuals
<p><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;background-color:oklch(0.99 0.004 106.471);color:oklch(0.304 0.04 213.681);display:inline !important;float:none;font-family:__fkGroteskNeue_598ab8, __fkGroteskNeue_Fallback_598ab8, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol", "Noto Color Emoji";font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;orphans:2;text-align:start;text-decoration-color:initial;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-thickness:initial;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;">This critique of the study by Müller et al. examines the implications of radiative forcing geoengineering on Arctic wildfires and permafrost thaw. The authors argue that while Müller et al. assert that geoengineering increases these risks, their findings actually indicate a reduction in risk compared to high-emission scenarios (RCP8.5), albeit less effectively than targeted emissions reductions (RCP4.5). Key concerns include the inappropriate baseline comparison used in the study, which mischaracterizes the effectiveness of geoengineering interventions, and the limited scope of geoengineering strategies considered, potentially leading to overgeneralizations. The critique emphasizes the necessity for accurate framing and communication of geoengineering's potential impacts to avoid misinterpretation and to inform climate response strategies effectively.</span></p>
document
http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7st7v7p
eng
geoscientificInformation
Text
publication
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
publication
2024-12-01T00:00:00Z
<span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;font-style:normal;" data-sheets-root="1">Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</span>
None
OpenSky Support
UCAR/NCAR - Library
PO Box 3000
Boulder
80307-3000
name: homepage
pointOfContact
OpenSky Support
UCAR/NCAR - Library
PO Box 3000
Boulder
80307-3000
name: homepage
pointOfContact
2025-12-24T17:59:59.878491